Yay or nay? For decades now, a growing number of countries control or heavily limit the use of Glyphosate due to its high toxicity and link to serious health outcomes. Powerful lobbying from some of the world's richest countries has kept this toxic substance heavily in the food supply for many years now. But the balance of power is changing.
From a common sense perspective: does it sound intelligent to spray something incredibly toxic, that bio-accumulates in your body, and can create subclinical illness, on your food and then eat it? I think most people would realize that's not a good idea but we've come to accept it because it has been normalized.
What we must grasp as a collective is that toxins can produce subclinical effects. This is a way of saying, we don't have serious health outcomes but we're still sick. Further, toxins ar all around us, and while our body has detoxifying organs, when you put too much load on these systems with 1000's of insults, our bodies break down slowly and often subclinically. Things become normalized like headaches, brain fog, less energy, hormone disruption, diabetes, heart attacks etc. Yay or nay? For decades now, a growing number of countries control or heavily limit the use of Glyphosate due to its high toxicity and link to serious health outcomes. Powerful lobbying from some of the world's richest countries has kept this toxic substance heavily in the food supply for many years now. But the balance of power is changing.
From a common sense perspective: does it sound intelligent to spray something incredibly toxic, that bio-accumulates in your body, and can create subclinical illness, on your food and then eat it? I think most people would realize that's not a good idea but we've come to accept it because it has been normalized.
What we must grasp as a collective is that toxins can produce subclinical effects. This is a way of saying, we don't have serious health outcomes but we're still sick. Further, toxins ar all around us, and while our body has detoxifying organs, when you put too much load on these systems with 1000's of insults, our bodies break down slowly and often subclinically. Things become normalized like headaches, brain fog, less energy, hormone disruption, diabetes, heart attacks etc.
Science insanely focuses on studying each of these compounds individually, not realizing people are surrounded by a toxic soup of toxins, not just one. So when something is said to be 'safe', what does that really mean when there are thousands of other toxins the body has to deal with? As I mentioned before, this is the paradigm shift occurring, people realizing that the reductionist thinking we've been doing for so long is causing us to miss out on reality while giving us the perception we are being 'scientific.'

Science insanely focuses on studying each of these compounds individually, not realizing people are surrounded by a toxic soup of toxins, not just one. So when something is said to be 'safe', what does that really mean when there are thousands of other toxins the body has to deal with? As I mentioned before, this is the paradigm shift occurring, people realizing that the reductionist thinking we've been doing for so long is causing us to miss out on reality while giving us the perception we are being 'scientific.'Yay or nay? For decades now, a growing number of countries control or heavily limit the use of Glyphosate due to its high toxicity and link to serious health outcomes. Powerful lobbying from some of the world's richest countries has kept this toxic substance heavily in the food supply for many years now. But the balance of power is changing.
From a common sense perspective: does it sound intelligent to spray something incredibly toxic, that bio-accumulates in your body, and can create subclinical illness, on your food and then eat it? I think most people would realize that's not a good idea but we've come to accept it because it has been normalized.
What we must grasp as a collective is that toxins can produce subclinical effects. This is a way of saying, we don't have serious health outcomes but we're still sick. Further, toxins ar all around us, and while our body has detoxifying organs, when you put too much load on these systems with 1000's of insults, our bodies break down slowly and often subclinically. Things become normalized like headaches, brain fog, less energy, hormone disruption, diabetes, heart attacks etc.
Science insanely focuses on studying each of these compounds individually, not realizing people are surrounded by a toxic soup of toxins, not just one. So when something is said to be 'safe', what does that really mean when there are thousands of other toxins the body has to deal with? As I mentioned before, this is the paradigm shift occurring, people realizing that the reductionist thinking we've been doing for so long is causing us to miss out on reality while giving us the perception we are being 'scientific.'